2008年5月15日 星期四
Questions and sub-questions in phonology (overlappings)
A. How and why does pronunciation change over time?
a. How can we account for common patterns in diverse languages?
b. Why do we have different forms of the same word or morpheme in different contexts?
B. Why do we have accents since we have the same articulatory organs?
7. How is sound associate with meanings?
8. How did language and speech arise or evolve in our species?
A. Why is the vocal apparatus different as a function of the age and sex of the speaker?
B. What is the relation, if any, between human speech and non-human communication?
a. Is it possible to communicate with animals if we knew their sound meanings?
Important questions in phonology for me
Q2: How do sounds relate to meanings?
Q3: Why do people have accents since we have the same articulatory organs?
Q4: Is it possible to communicate with animals if we knew their sound meanings?
Q5: How do phonologists contribute to human civilization?
Q6: What are the current and latest phonological studies in the world?
Q7: What are the methods that we can use in doing phonological research?
Q8: What is the whole picture of phonology history?
Overlappings between my questions and the questions in the textbook: 3 (Q. 2,3,4)
2008年5月6日 星期二
Grounded Phonology
1. Grounded Phonology
Diana Archangeli and Douglas Pulleyblank
2. Chinese Affixal Phonology: some Analytical and Theoretical Issues
Yen-Hwei Lin. Michigan State University.
3. Remarks and Replies: The Directionality of Emphasis Spread in Arabic.
Janet C. E. Watson
4. A Formal Functional Model of Tone
James Myers and Jane Tsay. National Chung Cheng University
5. A grounded account of voicing in obstruent clusters
Wouter Jansen – NWO/University of Groningen
6. Functional grounding inside the phonology: Evidence from positional augmentation
Jennifer L. Smith. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
7. FORMALLY-GROUNDED PHONOLOGY
FROM CONSTRAINT-BASED THEORIES TO THEORY-BASED CONSTRAINTS*
Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho. Université René Descartes - Paris V
8. Natural and Unnatural Sound Patterns: A Pocket Field Guide
Juliette Blevins. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
9. An OT Account of Laryngealization in Cuzco Quechua
Steve Parker
10. Constraint Conjunction versus Grounded Constraint Subhierarchies in Optimality Theory
Jaye Padgett - University of California, Santa Cruz (Version July 29, 2002)
11. Embedded Structure and the Evolution of Phonology
J.C. Brown & Chris Golston.
University of British Columbia & California State University, Fresno
12. Perception of fricatives by Dutch and English speakers
Keith Johnson and Molly Babel. University of California, Berkeley
Jaye Padgett - University of California, Santa Cruz (Version July 29, 2002)
Sign Language Phonology
1. Sign Language Phonology.
Wendy Sandler. The University of Haifa.
2. Research on Sign Language of the Netherlands
Department of Linguistics, Radboud University Nijmegen
3. Taiwan Sign Language Research: A Historical Overview
Wayne H. Smith. Learning unlimited Language School
4. The first signs of language: phonological development in British Sign
Language
Gary Morgan, Sarah Barrett-Jones & Helen Stoneham. City University, London
5. SIGN LANGUAGE TUTORING TOOL
Oya Aran, Cem Keskin, Lale Akarun. Department of Computer Engineering, Bogazici University, Bebek
6. Phonological priming in British Sign Language
Matthew W. G. Dye and Shui-I Shih
7. Paving theWay to Sign Language Processing
Antˆonio Carlos da Rocha Costa and Grac¸aliz Pereira Dimuro
Escola de Inform´atica, Universidade Cat´olica de Pelotas
8. Sign Synthesis and Sign Phonology
Angus B. Grieve-Smith. Linguistics Department. University of New Mexico
9. Biology and behaviour: insights from the acquisition of sign language
Gary Morgan. Language and Communication Science. City University London.
10. SIGN LANGUAGE
11. Irish Sign Language
12. Framework for Instruction in American Sign Language
Virginia's Public Schools
2008年5月1日 星期四
Chpater 2---2.2 outline of “Tholantlang Lai Tonology”
2. Elicitation as Experimental Phonology
– Thlantlang Lai Tonology
2.2 outline of “Tholantlang Lai Tonology”
I. The data from Thlantlang dialect of Lai in
- A monosyllabic language
- Falling tone (F), Rising tone (R), F/R tone
II. An alternation in Thlantlang dialect of Lai
- Falling tone becomes rising tone after ká (my)
- Find out the underlying forms:
a. F/R words are underlying /H/
H to HL / __ pause
b. R words are underlying /L/
L to LH / __ pause
- Contour tones:
a. All non-final tones must be either H or L
b. All final tones must be either falling or rising
c. Lag-IO(L): An input L should extend onto the following syllable
d. JUMP (UP): L tone cannot jumps to H tone
III. Question raised
- Why is /H/ realized LH after ká =my?
a. originally designated as F/R
b. H nouns are pronounced with any of surface tones.
c. Historical aspect: /H/ nouns have a /LH/ allomorph after pronominal proclitics.
2008年4月16日 星期三
John Ohala

1. John Ohala is a Professor Emeritus in linguistics at the University of California, Berkeley.
2. He specializes in phonetics and phonology.
3. He received his PhD in Linguistics in 1969 from University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); his graduate advisor was Peter Ladefoged.
參考資料: wikipedia
相關連結: John Ohala
2008年3月6日 星期四
Outline of chapter one (Methods in Phonology)
- This book focuses on methodology, rather than exclusively on particular theories or questions is motivated by the all-important role that methodology has in determing the scientific rigor and maturity of a discipline.
1.2 Questions, Answers, Method
- the questions it asks
- the answers given to the questions, that is, hypotheses or theories
- the methods used to marshal evidence in support of the theories
Outline of Preface
1. The two central facets of experimental approaches:
- First facet
Experimental methods are foundational to testing hypotheses concerning speakers’ and listeners’ knowledge of their native sound systems, the acquisition of those systems, and the laws that govern sound systems.
- Second facet
It is on the phonological findings that emerge from the use of experimental techniques and their theoretical implications.
2. The factors of the change of new experimental techniques
2.1 Diverse questions need multifaceted methods to test.
2.2 Technologies relevant to phonological inquiry continue to evolve.
2.3 Growing recognition with biological, social or cognitive framework
2.4 To form principles for modeling
3. Major phonological issues in the book:
3.1 explaining ohonological universals
3.2 understanding the phonetic factors that may give rise to phonological change
3.3 maintaining, enhancing, and modeling phonological contrast
3.4 assessing phonological knowledge
4. The phonological issues organized in the book:
4.1. explaining phonological universals
- Part I: Theory and Background
- Ohala, Hyman, Hohnson, Kohler, Vaissiere
- Part II: Phonological Universals
- Demolin, Maddieson, Schwartz, Boe, Abry
4.2 understanding the phonetic factors that may give rise to phonological change
- Part III: Phonetic Variation and Phonological Change
- Beddor, Brasher, Narayan, Blevins, Busa, Engstrand, Frid, Lindblom, Basboll
4.3 maintaining, enhancing, and modeling phonological contrast
- Part IV: Maintainging, Enhancing, and Modeling Phonological contrasts
- Bonaventura, Fujimura, Fujisaki, Gu, Ohno, M. Nearey, Assmann, Roengpitya, Sole
4.4 assessing phonological knowledge
- Part V: Phonotactic and Phonological Knowledge
- Derwing, Nooteboom, Quene, Ohala, Pysha, Inkelas, Sprouse, Shin
2008年1月19日 星期六
諾貝爾生理學或醫學獎
諾貝爾生理學或醫學獎,是諾貝爾獎的一個獎項。根據阿爾弗雷德·諾貝爾逝世前所立下的遺囑,諾貝爾生理學或醫學獎應由位於瑞典首都斯德哥爾摩的卡羅琳醫學院負責頒發。頒獎儀式於每年12月10日,諾貝爾逝世周年紀念日舉行。諾貝爾生理醫學獎是為了表彰前一年當中,在生理學或者醫學領域有重要的發現或發明的人。
原本諾貝爾生理醫學獎的評選,是由卡羅琳醫學院的教員完成。現在的評選工作,則根據諾貝爾基金會的相關章程,由卡羅琳醫學院的諾貝爾大會負責,此大會是由50名選舉出來的卡羅琳醫學院名教授組成。
目前生理醫學獎的評選程序大致為:
1. 卡羅琳醫學院的諾貝爾大會任命一個工作委員會負責前期工作。
2. 邀請生理醫學領域的代表提名候選人,提名截至日期為每年2月1日。
3. 諾貝爾委員會對提名進行初步篩選,然後候選人提交給諾貝爾大會。
4. 諾貝爾大會最終決定得主,並對外公佈(一般在每年10月份)。
5. 每年12月10日在斯德哥爾摩音樂廳舉行頒獎儀式。
相關連結: 歷年獲獎者介紹
資料來源: wikipedia
About "Literary Semiotics"
Semiotic literary criticism, also called literary semiotics, is the approach to literary criticism informed by the theory of signs or semiotics. Semiotics, tied closely to the structuralism pioneered by Ferdinand de Saussure, was extremely influential in the development of literary theory out of the formalist approaches of the early twentieth century.
The early forms of literary semiotics grew out of formalist approaches to literature, especially Russian formalism, and structuralist linguistics, especially the Prague school. Notable early semiotic authors included Vladimir Propp, Algirdas Julius Greimas, and Viktor Shklovsky.
資料來源: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_semiotics
Semiotics for beginners (by Daniel Chandler)
Contents Page
Preface
Introduction
Signs
Modality and representation
Paradigms and syntagms
Syntagmatic analysis
Paradigmatic analysis
Denotation, connotation and myth
Rhetorical tropes
Codes
Modes of address
Encoding/Decoding
Articulation
Intertextuality
Criticisms of semiotic analysis
Strengths of semiotic analysis
D.I.Y. semiotic analysis
Glossary of key terms
Suggested reading
References
Index
Semiotics links
S4B Message Board
S4B Chatroom
資料來源: http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem01.html
2008年1月16日 星期三
克莉絲蒂娃 (Julia Kristeva)

1. 法籍保加利亞哲學家, 文學批評, 心理分析學家, 女性主義, 小說家
2. 1969 著書<>
3. 支持符號學是與佛洛伊德和拉岡所提出的嬰孩時期的「鏡像理論」有關,認為符號是種情緒力量,緊繫著人的天性,存在於語言的隔閡當中,而非存在於文字的意義符號上。
相關影片:
1. Julia Kristeva - On Linguistics
2. Julia Kristeva
生平連結: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Kristeva
圖片來源: ms.cc.sunysb.edu/~hvolat/kristeva/Kristeva.jpg
2008年1月6日 星期日
1906諾貝爾得主之卡哈爾 (Santiago Romŏn y Cajal)

1906諾貝爾得主之哥爾奇 (Camillo Golgi)

相關影片:
1. Camillo Golgi
1973諾貝爾得主之丁伯根 (Nikolaas Tinbergen)

*1973 諾貝爾生理醫學獎得主
1. 荷蘭動物行為學家 (Konrad Lorenz的門生)
2. 得獎事由: 研究棘魚爭鬥及求偶行為,此為研究高等哺乳類的基礎。
3. 生態學相關著作:
1951 The Study of Instinct-Oxford, Clarendon Press
1953 The Herring Gull’s World-London, Country Collins
1958 Curious Naturalists-London, Country Life
1972 The Animal in its World Vol. 1.-London, Allen & Unwin; Harvard University Press
1973 The Animal in its World Vol. 2-London, Allen & Unwin; Harvard University Press
資料來源: 諾貝爾獎:生理.醫學 台北市:橘井,1990
圖片來源: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1973/tinbergen-autobio.html
生平連結: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1973/tinbergen-autobio.html
1973諾貝爾得主之勞倫茲 (Konrad Lorenz)

1. 維也納動物行為學家
2. 現代動物行為學之父
3. 1949 著書<所羅門王的指環>
1951 主持慕尼黑的蒲朗克行為生理學研究所
1963 著書<論鬥性>
1989 著書<雁鵝與勞倫茲>
5. 得獎事由:
b.
c. 鬥性理論(aggression)
資料來源: 諾貝爾獎:生理.醫學 台北市:橘井,1990
圖片來源: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1973/lorenz-autobio.html
生平連結: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1973/lorenz-autobio.html
1973諾貝爾得主之費立區(Karl von Frisch)

1. 奧地利動物行為學家
2. 1910年在慕尼黑取得Ph.D
3. 1925年在慕尼黑大學主持具有最佳研究設備的新動物學教室
4. 得獎事由:研究蜜蜂語言: 工蜂能夠分析我們見不到的偏光 之紫外線與太陽的關
5. 重要事蹟:
1914/15 蜜蜂的色彩感覺與形態感覺
1919 蜜蜂的嗅覺與其花生物學意義
1923 蜜蜂的「語言」動物心理學研究
1932 一種淡水魚的聽覺所在(與 R. 修特塔共著)
1934 蜜蜂的味覺
1941 魚的皮膚之驚愕物值與其生物學意義
1946 蜜蜂之舞
1949 天空之偏光為蜜蜂舞的定位因子
1950 太陽在蜜蜂的生活中的指南針地位
1965 蜜蜂的跳舞語言與定位